News

Wiper Leader Refutes Gachagua’s Claim of Nairobi Power-Sharing Deal

Wiper leader Kalonzo Musyoka has publicly refuted assertions that his party reached a secret arrangement with former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua to cede control of major Nairobi electoral positions to the Democracy for the Citizens Party.

The denial came during a thanksgiving event in Machakos County, where Kalonzo characterized the rumors as deliberate misinformation designed to fracture opposition unity ahead of the 2027 general election.

ALSO READ: Health Ministry Clarifies HIV Statistics Amid Nairobi Data Confusion

Accusations of Government Propaganda

Addressing supporters and party faithful, the Wiper chief dismissed what he described as calculated attempts to sow discord among opposition forces working to challenge President William Ruto’s administration.

Kalonzo suggested that narratives about backroom deals between opposition leaders serve the interests of those seeking to weaken the united front being built against the current government. He called on Kenyans to reject such stories as manufactured distractions.

The opposition coalition, which brings together multiple parties and leaders who lost to Ruto in the previous election, has faced persistent questions about internal cohesion and competing ambitions among its principals.

What Gachagua Claimed

Earlier statements from the former Deputy President painted a dramatically different picture. Gachagua had outlined what he presented as an already finalized understanding that would give his newly formed party overwhelming dominance in Kenya’s capital.

According to his version of events, the Democracy for the Citizens Party would control nearly all parliamentary constituencies in Nairobi—16 out of 17—plus the governorship, Senate seat, and approximately 75 of the city’s 85 ward representative positions.

Such an arrangement, if genuine, would represent an extraordinary concession from Wiper, effectively surrendering the party’s competitive presence in one of Kenya’s most politically significant counties.

Gachagua framed the alleged deal as part of broader coalition negotiations, suggesting it formed part of a larger political calculus involving presidential ambitions and regional power-sharing.

Behind the Scenes Maneuvering

Political observers note that Gachagua’s public declarations may reflect ongoing private negotiations within opposition circles. Sources familiar with coalition discussions suggest the former Deputy President has been positioning himself as a kingmaker, potentially offering support for Kalonzo’s presidential aspirations in exchange for strategic concessions in key urban areas.

Such horse-trading is common in Kenyan politics, where coalition building often involves complex bargains over electoral territories, cabinet positions, and legislative influence. However, making such deals public before they’re finalized can backfire, as appears to have happened in this instance.

The tension highlights fundamental challenges facing any opposition coalition: balancing the presidential ambitions of multiple leaders while distributing power in ways that satisfy each party’s base and maintain united messaging.

Coalition Under Strain

This is not the first time the united opposition has faced allegations of secret meetings and unauthorized negotiations. Several leaders within the coalition have previously accused one another of making independent political moves without consulting the broader group.

Despite these recurring tensions, coalition principals have consistently insisted their alliance remains solid. They’ve pledged to field a single presidential candidate against Ruto rather than splitting opposition votes as has happened in past elections.

Whether that unity can survive the pressures of seat negotiations, personality clashes, and competing regional interests remains an open question as the 2027 election approaches.

The 2027 Stakes

President Ruto has challenged opposition leaders to articulate a policy agenda rather than simply campaigning on removing him from office. His administration argues that criticism without alternative proposals amounts to political noise rather than serious governance competition.

Opposition figures counter that their primary objective—changing leadership—represents a legitimate political platform in itself. They argue that Ruto’s policies have failed Kenyans and that removing his administration constitutes the most important service they can offer voters.

This fundamental debate about opposition strategy—whether to focus on policy alternatives or simply on defeating the incumbent—adds another layer of complexity to coalition management.

What Comes Next

Kalonzo’s public rejection of Gachagua’s claims forces both leaders into a delicate position. If negotiations were indeed underway, they’ve now been complicated by the public dispute. If no such talks occurred, Gachagua’s credibility within opposition circles takes a hit.

For ordinary Kenyans watching these political maneuvers, the spectacle reinforces longstanding cynicism about elite political deal-making that often seems disconnected from everyday concerns about the economy, security, and public services.

As the 2027 election cycle intensifies, expect more such disputes to surface. Coalition politics in Kenya have always been messy, characterized by public feuds, reconciliations, and last-minute realignments. Whether the current opposition grouping can navigate these challenges successfully will determine if they present a credible alternative to Ruto’s administration or simply repeat the disunity that has plagued previous attempts to unseat an incumbent president.

For now, Kalonzo has drawn a clear line: Wiper is not surrendering Nairobi to anyone, and reports suggesting otherwise are fiction designed to divide and weaken the opposition’s 2027 prospects.